Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Movie Review: Pocahontas


Chandler, my boyfriend, and I watched Disney’s version of Pocahontas to compare the true story to the story depicted in the movie. While some parts seemed quite accurate, other parts are so very wrong that it is hard to accept the movie as something that children watch to learn about the “New World”.
            First, we should probably point out the fact that animals don’t talk. Neither do trees. Sorry Disney, but even though the Native Americans were very in touch with nature, they could not talk to other species or inanimate objects.
            Another very important fact is that Pocahontas’ real name is Matoaka; Pocahontas was just a child hood nickname to describe her sense of adventure.
Just to be clear, she was about 10 to 12 when she first met John Smith. Smith was about 30. We realize that Disney had to change the ages around so the romance isn’t pedophilia, but in real life, their relationship was a mere friendship.
There is some debate over whether Pocahontas actually saved John Smith’s life, as he was an avid liar and the only version of the tale that is written is in his journal. However, if it did happen, it was because she was friends with him, not because she was in love with him. Stories say she did cradle his head in her arms though right before her dad almost gave the death blow to stop the killing. So props Disney. Afterwards, however, they didn’t just set him free. Smith had to be a laborer for the tribe until he was trusted enough to be set free.
In case you haven’t already figured, Pocahontas did not marry Smith. She actually married Kocoum, who was her arranged marriage in the movie. During this time, she helped out the British though, teaching them how to live off the land. For the tribe, she was considered their translator, and helped them work out agreements to avoid war. The Native Americans had to resort to this because their population kept getting wiped out by European diseases.
The British saw how valuable this girl was, since she was the reason that the Europeans where having a harder time taking advantage of the Native Americans near Jamestown. The British Crown also wanted to renew fervor in the settlement of Virginia, by showing there is no danger in the colony. So, when she was about 17, the British kidnapped her and tried to convert her to Christianity. While captive, Pocahontas fell in love with John Rolfe, a very rich tobacco farmer, and they married after she converted. This caused peace between the settlers and Native Americans. She then visited Europe and died of a disease after meeting the king and queen.
The movie doesn’t touch on any of that, as that does not shed a positive light on our own European heritage. It did get a few things right though. For example, the British did want God, glory, and gold and were hell-bent on killing some natives. They feared the Native Americans, and did not have any qualms in killing them for their land. It was also correct in the fact that there was very little to no gold in Virginia.
We think the thing this movie does the best is to show the European and Native American perception of trying to share the land. It shows how Europeans didn’t care who currently owned the land or whether others were there first, they just claimed it as their own with a flag and some drums. Even though the Native Americans were on the land first, they were considered the intruders. The movie nicely showed how the British tried to clear their conscious of taking so much by saying that they were helping savages become ready for a high society. The movie kind of lacks in showing the complexity of the Native American societies, however, which is why many Native American Study scholars feels so deeply against this movie. The Native Americans were not cast in a very complimentary light.

PS. The dog of the evil British governor? That was a true fact. A  fashion symbol of the time believe it or not. He was just that cool.

Sincerely Sydney

No comments:

Post a Comment